4.7 Article

Carbon dynamics in the western Arctic Ocean: insights from full-depth carbon isotope profiles of DIC, DOC, and POC

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 1217-1224

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-9-1217-2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. WHOI Arctic Research Initiative
  2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  3. Canadian International Polar Year Office
  4. US National Science Foundation [OPP-0424864]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Polar Programs [0909377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [0753487] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arctic warming is projected to continue throughout the coming century. Yet, our currently limited understanding of the Arctic Ocean carbon cycle hinders our ability to predict how changing conditions will affect local Arctic ecosystems, regional carbon budgets, and global climate. We present here the first set of concurrent, full-depth, dual-isotope profiles for dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and suspended particulate organic carbon (POCsusp) at two sites in the Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean. The carbon isotope composition of sinking and suspended POC in the Arctic contrasts strongly with open ocean Atlantic and Pacific sites, pointing to a combination of inputs to Arctic POCsusp at depth, including surface-derived organic carbon (OC), sorbed/advected OC, and OC derived from in situ DIC fixation. The latter process appears to be particularly important at intermediate depths, where mass balance calculations suggest that OC derived from in situ DIC fixation contributes up to 22% of POCsusp. As in other oceans, surface-derived OC is still a dominant source to Arctic POCsusp. Yet, we suggest that significantly smaller vertical POC fluxes in the Canada Basin make it possible to see evidence of DIC fixation in the POCsusp pool even at the bulk isotope level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据