4.3 Article

Genome-Guided Characterization of Ochrobactrum sp POC9 Enhancing Sewage Sludge Utilization-Biotechnological Potential and Biosafety Considerations

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071501

关键词

antibiotic resistance; biosafety; biogas production; Ochrobactrum sp POC9; methane; sewage sludge utilization

资金

  1. Gekon 2 (Generator of Ecological CONcepts) programme of the National Centre for Research and Development (Poland)
  2. National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (Poland) [GEKON2/O2/266405/7/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sewage sludge is an abundant source of microorganisms that are metabolically active against numerous contaminants, and thus possibly useful in environmental biotechnologies. However, amongst the sewage sludge isolates, pathogenic bacteria can potentially be found, and such isolates should therefore be carefully tested before their application. A novel bacterial strain, Ochrobactrum sp. POC9, was isolated from a sewage sludge sample collected from a wastewater treatment plant. The strain exhibited lipolytic, proteolytic, cellulolytic, and amylolytic activities, which supports its application in biodegradation of complex organic compounds. We demonstrated that bioaugmentation with this strain substantially improved the overall biogas production and methane content during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. The POC9 genome content analysis provided a deeper insight into the biotechnological potential of this bacterium and revealed that it is a metalotolerant and a biofilm-producing strain capable of utilizing various toxic compounds. The strain is resistant to rifampicin, chloramphenicol and (beta-lactams. The corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (including bla(OCH) and cmlA/floR) were identified in the POC9 genome. Nevertheless, as only few genes in the POC9 genome might be linked to pathogenicity, and none of those genes is a critical virulence factor found in severe pathogens, the strain appears safe for application in environmental biotechnologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据