4.3 Article

Different Risk Factors for Very Low Birth Weight, Term-Small-for-Gestational-Age, or Preterm Birth in Japan

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020369

关键词

birth cohort; parental factor; fetal growth restriction; socioeconomic condition

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [H26-Kagaku Ippan-002]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Kiban-A) [16H02645]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H02645] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From 1985 to 2013, the mean birth weight of infants in Japan decreased from 3120 g to 3000 g, and the low-birth-weight rate among live births increased from 6.3% to 9.6%. No prospective study has elucidated the risk factors for poor fetal growth and preterm birth in recent Japanese parents, such as increased parental age, maternal body figure, assisted reproductive technology (ART), and socioeconomic status. Participants were mother-infant pairs (n = 18,059) enrolled in a prospective birth cohort in Hokkaido, Japan from 2002 to 2013. Parental characteristics were obtained via self-reported questionnaires during pregnancy. Medical records helped identify very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; < 1500 g), term-small-for-gestational-age (term-SGA), and preterm-birth (PTB; < 37 weeks) infants. We calculated relative risks (RRs) for PTB, VLBW, and term-SGA birth based on parental characteristics. The prevalence of PTB, VLBW, and term-SGA was 4.5%, 0.4%, and 6.5%, respectively. Aged parents and ART were risk factors for PTB and VLBW. Maternal alcohol drinking during pregnancy increased the risk; a parental educational level of >= 16 years reduced risk of term-SGA. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI of < 18.5 kg/m(2) increased the risk of PTB and term-SGA. The RR for low BMI was highest among mothers who have low educational level. Among various factors, appropriate nutritional education to maintain normal BMI is important to prevent PTB and term-SGA in Japan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据