4.7 Article

Dendritic Neuron Model With Effective Learning Algorithms for Classification, Approximation, and Prediction

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2846646

关键词

Approximation; brain; classification; dendritic neuron model (DNM); global learning algorithms; prediction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673403, U1611262, 61472284]
  2. Opening Project of Guangdong High-Performance Computing Society [2017060109]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K12751]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An artificial neural network (ANN) that mimics the information processing mechanisms and procedures of neurons in human brains has achieved a great success in many fields, e.g., classification, prediction, and control. However, traditional ANNs suffer from many problems, such as the hard understanding problem, the slow and difficult training problems, and the difficulty to scale them up. These problems motivate us to develop a new dendritic neuron model (DNM) by considering the nonlinearity of synapses, not only for a better understanding of a biological neuronal system, but also for providing a more useful method for solving practical problems. To achieve its better performance for solving problems, six learning algorithms including biogeography-based optimization, particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, ant colony optimization, evolutionary strategy, and population-based incremental learning are for the first time used to train it. The best combination of its user-defined parameters has been systemically investigated by using the Taguchi's experimental design method. The experiments on 14 different problems involving classification, approximation, and prediction are conducted by using a multilayer perceptron and the proposed DNM. The results suggest that the proposed learning algorithms are effective and promising for training DNM and thus make DNM more powerful in solving classification, approximation, and prediction problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据