4.3 Article

Silicon application during vegetative propagation affects photosynthetic protein expression in strawberry

期刊

HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 167-177

出版社

KOREAN SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-018-0022-2

关键词

Foliar spray; Fragaria x ananassa; Potassium silicate; Si; Subirrigation

资金

  1. Agrobio-Industry Technology Development Program, Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea [315004-5]
  2. BK21 Plus Program, the Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the effect of source, concentration, and application method of silicon (Si) on the growth, development, and photosynthetic capacity of Fragaria x ananassa 'Maehyang' and 'Seolhyang'. We applied 0, 35, or 70 mg L-1 Si in a potassium silicate (K2SiO3), sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), or calcium silicate (CaSiO3) solution to plants via subirrigational supply or foliar application. Plant height of 'Maehyang' was highest with the 70 mg L-1 Si Na2SiO3 foliar application, but it was not significantly different among treatments in 'Seolhyang'. Crown size was not significantly affected by source, concentration, or application method in both cultivars. Elemental concentrations in the shoot and root of 'Maehyang' were the highest in the 35 mg L-1 Si Na2SiO3 treatment for both application methods. Elemental concentrations in the shoot and root of 'Seolhyang' were the highest in the 70 mg L-1 Si K2SiO3 foliar application. Photosynthetic proteins abundantly increased in both cultivars with the 35 or 70 mg L-1 Si K2SiO3 treatment, for both application methods. Moreover, two important photosynthetic proteins, viz. PsaA and PsbA, were expressed and their expressions were higher with the 35 or 70 mg L-1 Si K2SiO3 treatment, for both application methods. These results suggested that 35 or 70 mg L-1 Si, supplied in the form of K2SiO3, promoted photosynthetic protein expressions the greatest, regardless of the application method, in both 'Maehyang' and 'Seolhyang'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据