4.1 Article

The river continuum concept predicts prey assemblage structure for an insectivorous fish along a temperate riverscape

期刊

FRESHWATER SCIENCE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 618-630

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/699013

关键词

stream ecosystems; river zonation; river continuum concept; community ecology; predator-prey interactions; riverine landscapes

资金

  1. Department of Biology at Tennessee Technological University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The river continuum concept (RCC) provides a framework for processes structuring lotic ecosystems by synthesizing sources and transport of C in streams. Considerable attention, refinement, and testing of the RCC has occurred since its inception >35 y ago, but few investigators have tested its predictions by explicitly linking consumer groups. We assessed insect assemblage structure in the diet of a broadly distributed insectivorous fish (Cottus carolinae) in the Roaring River continuum of Tennessee to test 3 predictions from the RCC: 1) longitudinal change in relative biomass of insect functional feeding groups (FFGs) including decrease for shredders, increase for collectors, intermediate maximum for grazers, and consistency for predators; 2) maximum taxonomic diversity at stream orders 3 to 5; and 3) temporal turnover in taxonomic composition across 1 y. We found that relative biomass of insect FFGs consumed by C. carolinae broadly matched predictions from the RCC. Maximum taxonomic diversity assessed at the family rank occurred at stream order 4 where diel and annual water temperature fluctuations were greatest, and monthly prey assemblages followed a sequence of turnover and a return to starting conditions across 1 y. Our novel approach illustrates proof of concept that RCC tenets are integrated into the diet of at least 1 higher-level consumer and, therefore, transcend assemblage boundaries in regulating the longitudinal (up- to downstream) and vertical (multiple consumer groups) flow of C in streams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据