4.5 Article

Shrimp ponds lead to massive loss of soil carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in northeastern Brazilian mangroves

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 5530-5540

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4079

关键词

blue carbon; carbon loss; land use carbon footprint; tidal wetlands; tropical wetlands

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  2. CNPq/FAPES PELD-HCES [441243/2016-9, 79054684/17]
  3. FAPESP [2017/08101-1]
  4. CNPq [308288/2014-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mangroves of the semiarid Caatinga region of northeastern Brazil are being rapidly converted to shrimp pond aquaculture. To determine ecosystem carbon stocks and potential greenhouse gas emissions from this widespread land use, we measured carbon stocks of eight mangrove forests and three shrimp ponds in the Acarau and Jaguaribe watersheds in Ceara state, Brazil. The shrimp ponds were paired with adjacent intact mangroves to ascertain carbon losses and potential emissions from land conversion. The mean total ecosystem carbon stock of mangroves in this semiarid tropical landscape was 413 +/- 94 Mg C/ha. There were highly significant differences in the ecosystem carbon stocks between the two sampled estuaries suggesting caution when extrapolating carbon stock across different estuaries even in the same landscape. Conversion of mangroves to shrimp ponds resulted in losses of 58%-82% of the ecosystem carbon stocks. The mean potential emissions arising from mangrove conversion to shrimp ponds was 1,390 Mg CO(2)e/ha. Carbon losses were largely from soils which accounted for 81% of the total emission. Losses from soils >100cm in depth accounted for 33% of the total ecosystem carbon loss. Soil carbon losses from shrimp pond conversion are equivalent to about 182years of soil carbon accumulation. Losses from mangrove conversion are about 10-fold greater than emissions from conversion of upland tropical dry forest in the Brazilian Caatinga underscoring the potential value for their inclusion in climate change mitigation activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据