4.5 Review

Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 80-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.007

关键词

Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study; Adolescent; Child; Substance use; Alcohol; Cannabis; Marijuana; Nicotine; Longitudinal; Methods; Assessment; Drug use; Prescription drug use; Inhalants

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [U01DA041025, U01DA041148, U01DA041106, R01DA041528, U01DA041089, U24DA041147] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [U24 DA041147, U24 DA041123, U01 DA041022, U01 DA041093, U01 DA041048, U01 DA041148, U01 DA041106, U01 DA041089, U01 DA041025, U01 DA041156, U01 DA041174, R01 DA041528, R01 DA041353, U01 DA051039] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the objectives of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org/) is to establish a national longitudinal cohort of 9 and 10 year olds that will be followed for 10 years in order to prospectively study the risk and protective factors influencing substance use and its consequences, examine the impact of substance use on neurocognitive, health and psychosocial outcomes, and to understand the relationship between substance use and psychopathology. This article provides an overview of the ABCD Study Substance Use Workgroup, provides the goals for the workgroup, rationale for the substance use battery, and includes details on the substance use module methods and measurement tools used during baseline, 6-month and 1-year follow-up assessment time-points. Prospective, longitudinal assessment of these substance use domains over a period of ten years in a nationwide sample of youth presents an unprecedented opportunity to further understand the timing and interactive relationships between substance use and neurocognitive, health, and psychopathology outcomes in youth living in the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据