4.8 Article

Modulation of Apoptosis Controls Inhibitory Interneuron Number in the Cortex

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1710-1721

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.064

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC Starter Grant [282047]
  2. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [095589/Z/11/Z]
  3. FP7 EC DESIRE grant
  4. Lister Institute prize
  5. BBSRC [BB/L022974/1]
  6. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  7. Francis Crick Institute (MRC)
  8. Francis Crick Institute (Cancer Research UK)
  9. Francis Crick Institute (Wellcome Trust)
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [282047] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L022974/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MR/N026063/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. The Francis Crick Institute [10002, 10128] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. BBSRC [BB/L022974/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. MRC [MR/N026063/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. Wellcome Trust [095589/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cortical networks are composed of excitatory projection neurons and inhibitory interneurons. Finding the right balance between the two is important for controlling overall cortical excitation and network dynamics. However, it is unclear how the correct number of cortical interneurons (CIs) is established in the mammalian forebrain. CIs are generated in excess from basal forebrain progenitors, and their final numbers are adjusted via an intrinsically determined program of apoptosis that takes place during an early postnatal window. Here, we provide evidence that the extent of CI apoptosis during this critical period is plastic and cell-type specific and can be reduced in a cell-autonomous manner by acute increases in neuronal activity. We propose that the physiological state of the emerging neural network controls the activity levels of local CIs to modulate their numbers in a homeostatic manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据