4.8 Article

Citrullination of RGG Motifs in FET Proteins by PAD4 Regulates Protein Aggregation and ALS Susceptibility

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1473-1483

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology - Japan
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [16H01566, 25134707, 25710009]
  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  7. Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Health and Labor Sciences Research grants
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08634, 16KT0116, 17K16116, 16H01566, 16H02676, 17K09778, 26710007] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent proteome analyses have provided a comprehensive overview of various posttranslational modifications (PTMs);however, PTMs involving protein citrullination remain unclear. We performed a proteomic analysis of citrullinated proteins, and we identified more than 100 PAD4 (peptidyl arginine deiminase 4) substrates. Approximately one-fifth of the PAD4 substrates contained an RG/RGG motif, and PAD4 competitively inhibited the methylation of the RGG motif in FET proteins (FUS, EWS, and TAF15) and hnRNPA1, which are causative genes for ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). PAD4-mediated citrullination significantly inhibited the aggregation of FET proteins, a frequently observed feature in neurodegenerative diseases. FUS protein levels in arsenic-induced stress granules were significantly increased in Padi4(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Moreover, rs2240335 was associated with low expression of PADI4 in the brain and a high risk of ALS (p = 0.0381 and odds ratio of 1.072). Our findings suggest that PAD4-mediated RGG citrullination plays a key role in protein solubility and ALS pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据