4.8 Article

Commonly Occurring Cell Subsets in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Tumors Identified by Single-Cell Mass Cytometry

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1875-1888

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.053

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ovarian Cancer Teal Innovator Award
  2. U.S. Department of Defense [OC110674, W81XWH-14-1-0180]
  3. NIH [U19AI100627-02]
  4. Ann Schreiber Mentored Investigator Award from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund [OCRF 292495]
  5. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Postdoctoral Fellowship [CIHR 321510]
  6. International Society for Advancement of Cytometry scholarship
  7. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  8. Gabilon Stanford Graduate Research Fellowship
  9. Chronic Lymphocytic Research Consortium (CRC)
  10. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [T32CA009302] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI100627] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed an in-depth single-cell pheno-typic characterization of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) by multiparametric mass cytometry (CyTOF). Using a CyTOF antibody panel to interrogate features of HGSOC biology, combined with unsupervised computational analysis, we identified noteworthy cell types co-occurring across the tumors. In addition to a dominant cell subset, each tumor harbored rarer cell phenotypes. One such group co-expressed E-cadherin and vimentin (EV), suggesting their potential role in epithelial mesenchymal transition, which was substantiated by pairwise correlation analyses. Furthermore, tumors from patients with poorer outcome had an increased frequency of another rare cell type that co-expressed vimentin, HE4, and cMyc. These poorer-outcome tumors also populated more cell phenotypes, as quantified by Simpson's diversity index. Thus, despite the recognized genomic complexity of the disease, the specific cell phenotypes uncovered here offer a focus for therapeutic intervention and disease monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据