4.3 Article

Plasma Level of Retinol-Binding Protein 4, N-Terminal proBNP and Renal Function in Older Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure

期刊

CARDIORENAL MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 237-248

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000489403

关键词

Retinol-binding protein 4; N-Terminal-proBNP; Heart filure; Atrial fibrillation; Hypertension; Chronic kidney disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aim: Elevated plasma concentration of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) has recently emerged as a potential new risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension (HT) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Limited data suggest that RBP4 promotes inflammatory damage to cardiomyocytes and participates in the development of heart failure (HF). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between concentrations of plasma RBP4 and serum N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), a powerful biomarker of left ventricle dysfunction, in the older Polish population. Methods: The study sample consisted of 2,826 (1,487 men) participants of the PolSenior study, aged 65 years and older, including a subgroup hospitalized for HF (n = 282). In all subjects, plasma concentrations of RBP4, interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum level of NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP were measured. Additionally, BMI, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and HOMA-IR were calculated. The prevalence of HI, CAD, atrial fibrillation (AF), and medication were considered as potential confounders. Results: Similar RBP4 levels were found in subjects with NT-proBNP < 125 and >= 125 ng/mL, with and without AF, and in the subgroups hospitalized for HF with and without AF. Regression analysis revealed no association between log(10)(NT-proBNP) and log(10)(RBP4). Plasma levels of RBP4 were increased by HT occurrence and diuretic therapy, while diminished with regard to female gender, age, eGFR values, AF, and IL-6 levels. Conclusion: Our results show that RBP4 is affected by GFR but cannot be considered as an independent biomarker of heart muscle dysfunction. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据