4.4 Article

Polarizing Cues

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 52-66

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  2. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [0924191] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People categorize themselves and others, creating ingroup and outgroup distinctions. In American politics, parties constitute the in-and outgroups, and party leaders hold sway in articulating party positions. A party leader's endorsement of a policy can be persuasive, inducing co-partisans to take the same position. In contrast, a party leader's endorsement may polarize opinion, inducing out-party identifiers to take a contrary position. Using survey experiments from the 2008 presidential election, I examine whether in- and out-party candidate cues-John McCain and Barack Obama-affected partisan opinion. The results indicate that in-party leader cues do not persuade but that out-party leader cues polarize. This finding holds in an experiment featuring President Bush in which his endorsement did not persuade Republicans but it polarized Democrats. Lastly, I compare the effect of party leader cues to party label cues. The results suggest that politicians, not parties, function as polarizing cues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据