4.5 Review

A Systematic Review of Radiosurgery Versus Surgery for Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Vestibular Schwannomas

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 47-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.159

关键词

Hearing; Neurofibromatosis type 2; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Vestibular schwannoma

资金

  1. AMA Foundation Seed Grant
  2. AUA Carolyn L. Kuckein Student Research Fellowship
  3. David Geffen Medical Scholarship
  4. Gurtin Skull Base Research Fellowship
  5. UCLA Visionary Ball Fund Grant
  6. Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research UCLA Scholars in Translational Medicine Program Award
  7. Jason Dessel Memorial Seed Grant
  8. UCLA Honberger Endowment Brain Tumor Research Seed Grant
  9. Stop Cancer! Research Career Development Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs). NF2-associated VSs (NF2-VSs) are routinely treated with microsurgery; however, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective alternative in recent decades. To elucidate the role of SRS in NF2-VSs, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare outcomes of SRS versus surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried using relevant search terms. Retrospective studies investigating outcomes of NF2-VS patients treated with either SRS or surgery were included. Single-patient case reports were excluded. Outcome measures between the SRS and surgery groups were compared using chi(2) 2-sample tests for equality of proportions on the pooled patient data. RESULTS: A total of 974 patients (485 SRS, 489 surgery) were identified. The mean 5-year local control rate for SRS was 75.1%, and the mean recurrence rate for surgery was 8.1%. The mean hearing and facial nerve preservation rates were 40.1% and 92.3%, respectively, for SRS and 52.0% and 75.7%, respectively, for surgery. Rates of hearing preservation were higher after surgery than after SRS (P = 0.006), whereas rates of facial nerve preservation were higher after SRS than after surgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SRS appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for NF2-VS. Although rates of hearing preservation were higher in the surgery cohorts, SRS demonstrated high rates of local control and significantly lower facial nerve complications. Certain patients may therefore benefit more from SRS than surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据