4.5 Article

Postoperative Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Cavernous Sinus-Invading Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 E534-E545

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.043

关键词

Acromegaly; Cavernous sinus; Gamma knife radiosurgery; Growth hormone; Pituitary adenoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the long-term effects of Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) on remnants in the cavernous sinus (CS) after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for acromegaly and to identify its possible adverse effects. METHODS: Thirty patients who had remnant tumors only inside the CS after TSS and who consequently underwent GKS were included. They were followed for a median period of 47 months after GKS with regular hormonal and radiologic examinations. RESULTS: The mean tumor volume and margin dose irradiated by GKS was 3.7 cm(3) and 26.2 Gy, respectively. Radiologic tumor control was identified in all patients, and no tumor regrowth or recurrent tumors were identified. For 14 patients who achieved endocrinologic remission, the median duration from GKS until remission was 35 months. The actuarial rates of remission at 2, 5, and 10 years were 7.1%, 43.6%, and 65.6%, respectively. The degree of decrease in the nadir GH level in the OGTT at 6 months after GKS was a statistically significant predictor of remission. Newly developed hypopituitarism frequently developed in a time-dependent manner. Radiation necrosis developed in 4 patients with relatively large remnant volumes. CONCLUSIONS: GKS is an effective adjuvant treatment option for remnant tumors inside the CS after TSS. Maximal surgical resection, leaving minimal volume of remnants only inside the CS, allows the safe and sufficient delivery of a radiation dose to tumors, thereby increasing the possibility of remission. However, the risk of new hypopituitarism and radiation necrosis should be considered when tumors inside the CS are treated with GKS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据