4.5 Article

Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: Based on a Validated Finite Element Model

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 E1120-E1129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.158

关键词

Biomechanics; Finite element analysis (FEA); Facet joint stress (FJS); Internal fixation; Lumbar interbody fusion; Range of motion (ROM); Subsidence

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2016YFC1102002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion using cage supplemented with fixation has been used widely in the treatment of lumbar disease. A combined fixation (CF) of lateral plate and spinous process plate may provide multiplanar stability similar to that of bilateral pedicle screws (BPS) and may reduce morbidity. The biomechanical influence of the CF on cage subsidence and facet joint stress has not been well described. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanics of various fixation options and to verify biomechanical effects of the CF. METHODS: The surgical finite element models with various fixation options were constructed based on computed tomography images. The lateral plate and posterior spinous process plate were applied (CF). The 6 motion modes were simulated. Range of motion (ROM), cage stress, endplate stress, and facet joint stress were compared. RESULTS: For the CF model, ROM, cage stress, and endplate stress were the minimum in almost all motion modes. Compared with BPS, the CF reduced ROM, cage stress, and endplate stress in all motion modes. The ROM was reduced by more than 10% in all motion modes except for flexion; cage stress and endplate stress were reduced more than 10% in all motion modes except for rotation-left. After interbody fusion, facet joint stress was reduced substantially compared with the intact conditions in all motion modes except for flexion. CONCLUSIONS: The combined plate fixation may offer an alternative to BPS fixation in lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据