4.7 Article

High sensitization efficiency and energy transfer routes for population inversion at low pump intensity in Er organic complexes for IR amplification

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21700-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Queen Mary University of London (QMUL)
  3. Proof of Concept grant - QMUL
  4. EPSRC through the Silicon Photonics for Future Systems grant [EP/L00044X]
  5. QMUL
  6. EU FP7 (Marie Curie-CIG-Grant) [303535]
  7. Major State Basic Research Development Program [2013CB922101]
  8. NSFC [21371093, 61574095]
  9. EPSRC [EP/L020114/1, EP/P007767/1]
  10. EPSRC [EP/P007767/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L020114/1, EP/P007767/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic erbium complexes have long been of interest due to their potential for using the strong absorption into the organic to sensitise the erbium emission. Despite this interest there is remarkably little quantitative information on how effective the approach is and the discussion of the energy transfer mechanism is generally vague. Here we accurately quantify the sensitisation as a function of excitation pump density and model it using a rate equation approach. As a result, we can calculate the degree of population inversion for the erbium ions as a function of the pump intensity. We demonstrate that even when we increase the erbium concentration in the films from similar to 10 to similar to 80% we find a relatively small decrease in the sensitisation which we attribute to the large (> 20 angstrom) Forster radius for the sensitisation process. We show that we can obtain population inversion in our films at very low pump powers similar to 600 mW/cm(2). The calculated Forster radius for the organic erbium complexes suggests design rules for energy transfer between antennas and erbium ions in molecular systems and hybrid organic-inorganic nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据