4.7 Article

Quantitative proteomic analysis using iTRAQ to identify salt-responsive proteins during the germination stage of two Medicago species

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27935-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601993]
  2. China Forage and Grass Research System [CARS-34]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS14]
  4. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB943500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salt stress is one of the primary abiotic stresses responsible for decreasing crop yields worldwide. Germinating seeds can be greatly influenced by saline conditions. In this study, the physiological and phenotypic changes induced by salt treatments (10-50 mM NaCl and Na2SO4 mixtures) were analysed for Zhongmu-3 (Medicago sativa) and R108 (Medicago truncatula) seedlings. Our observations indicated that Zhongmu-3 was more salt-tolerant than R108. To characterize the protein expression profiles of these two Medicago species in response to salt stress, an iTRAQ- based quantitative proteomic analysis was applied to examine salt-responsive proteins. We identified 254 differentially changed salt-responsive proteins. Compared with control levels, the abundance of 121 proteins increased and 44 proteins decreased in salt-treated Zhongmu-3 seedlings, while 119 proteins increased and 18 proteins decreased in R108 seedlings. Moreover, 48 differentially changed proteins were common to Zhongmu-3 and R108 seedlings. A subsequent functional annotation indicated these proteins influenced diverse processes, such as catalytic activity, binding, and antioxidant activity. Furthermore, the corresponding transcript levels of 15 differentially changed proteins were quantified by qRT-PCR. The data presented herein provide new insights into salt-responsive proteins, with potential implications for enhancing the salt tolerance of Medicago species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据