4.8 Article

Impacts of Deployment Strategies on Localization Performance in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 1725-1733

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2362731

关键词

Localization performance; network connectivity; node deployment; underwater acoustic sensor networks (UASNs)

资金

  1. Qing Lan Project
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20131137]
  3. Applied Basic Research Program of the Nantong Science and Technology Bureau [BK2013032]
  4. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province China [2013KJCX0131]
  5. Special Fund of Guangdong Higher School Talent Recruitment
  6. Instituto de Telecomunicaes
  7. Next Generation Networks and Applications Group (NetGNA), Covilha Delegation
  8. National Funding from the FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [Pest-OE/EEI/LA0008/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When setting up an underwater acoustic sensor network (UASN), node deployment is the first and foremost task, upon which many fundamental network services, such as network topology control, routing, and boundary detection, will be built. While node deployment in 2-D terrestrial wireless sensor networks has been extensively studied, little attention has been received by their 3-D counterparts. This paper aims at analyzing the impacts of node deployment strategies on localization performances in a 3-D environment. More specifically, the simulations conducted in this paper reveal that the regular tetrahedron deployment scheme outperforms the random deployment scheme and the cube deployment scheme in terms of reducing localization error and increasing localization ratio while maintaining the average number of neighboring anchor nodes and network connectivity. Given the fact that random deployment is the primary choice for most of practical applications to date, our results are expected to shed some light on the design of UASNs in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据