4.7 Review

Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR) Domains Containing Intervening Motifs in Plants

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 288-311

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom2020288

关键词

leucine-rich repeats; Non-LRR island; LRR-RLK; LRR-RLP; TMK1; Os10g0479700; TONSOKU/BRUSHY1; MJK13.7; ligand interaction; dimerization

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23500368]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23500368] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LRRs (leucine rich repeats) are present in over 14,000 proteins. Non-LRR, island regions (IRs) interrupting LRRs are widely distributed. The present article reviews 19 families of LRR proteins having non-LRR IRs (LRR@IR proteins) from various plant species. The LRR@IR proteins are LRR-containing receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs), LRR-containing receptor-like proteins (LRR-RLPs), TONSOKU/BRUSHY1, and MJK13.7; the LRR-RLKs are homologs of TMK1/Rhg4, BRI1, PSKR, PSYR1, Arabidopsis At1g74360, and RPK2, while the LRR-RLPs are those of Cf-9/Cf-4, Cf-2/Cf-5, Ve, HcrVf, RPP27, EIX1, clavata 2, fascinated ear2, RLP2, rice Os10g0479700, and putative soybean disease resistance protein. The LRRs are intersected by single, non-LRR IRs; only the RPK2 homologs have two IRs. In most of the LRR-RLKs and LRR-RLPs, the number of repeat units in the preceding LRR block (N-1) is greater than the number of the following block (N-2); N-1 >> N-2 in which N-1 is variable in the homologs of individual families, while N-2 is highly conserved. The five families of the LRR-RLKs except for the RPK2 family show N-1 = 8 - 18 and N-2 = 3 - 5. The nine families of the LRR-RLPs show N-1 = 12 - 33 and N-2 = 4; while N-1 = 6 and N-2 = 4 for the rice Os10g0479700 family and the N-1 = 4 - 28 and N-2 = 4 for the soybean protein family. The rule of N-1 >> N-2 might play a common, significant role in ligand interaction, dimerization, and/or signal transduction of the LRR-RLKs and the LRR-RLPs. The structure and evolution of the LRR domains with non-LRR IRs and their proteins are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据