4.7 Article

Drivers of demographic decline across the annual cycle of a threatened migratory bird

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25633-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Bird Populations
  2. Environment Canada
  3. Lesser Slave Lake Bird Observatory
  4. Syncrude Canada Ltd.
  5. Hammerstone Corporation
  6. Canadian Natural Resources Limited
  7. Nexen Energy ULC
  8. Cenovus Energy
  9. ConocoPhillips Canada
  10. Devon Energy
  11. Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
  12. Imperial Oil Ltd.
  13. Suncor Energy
  14. TOTAL EP Canada
  15. Oil Sands Developers Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migratory species are rapidly declining but we rarely know which periods of the annual cycle are limiting for most species. This knowledge is needed to effectively allocate conservation resources to the periods of the annual cycle that best promote species recovery. We examined demographic trends and response to human footprint for Canada warblers (Cardellina canadensis), a threatened Neotropical migrant, using range-wide data (1993-2016) from the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program on the breeding grounds. Declines in abundance were steepest in the eastern breeding region, followed by the western region. Breeding productivity did not decline in any region. In contrast, we observed declining recruitment in all regions, low apparent survival in the east and west, and a decline in apparent survival in the east. Abundance declined with increasing disturbance around MAPS stations. Between 1993 and 2009, the human footprint index on the breeding range increased by 0.11% in contrast to a 14% increase on the wintering range. Landscape-scale disturbance on the breeding grounds may influence abundance in some regions; however, the observed trends in demography and footprint suggests limitation during the non-breeding period as the likely driver of overall declines, particularly for eastern populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据