4.7 Article

Solution structure of extracellular loop of human β4 subunit of BK channel and its biological implication on ChTX sensitivity

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23016-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0502302, 2017YPE0108200]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB 20000000]
  3. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91753119, 21472229, 21778065]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016YXMS261]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-conductance Ca2+- and voltage-dependent K+ (BK) channels display diverse biological functions while their pore-forming a subunit is coded by a single Slo1 gene. The variety of BK channels is correlated with the effects of BK alpha coexpression with auxiliary beta (beta 1-beta 4) subunits, as well as newly defined. subunits. Charybdotoxin (ChTX) blocks BK channel through physically occluding the K+-conduction pore. Human brain enriched beta 4 subunit (h beta 4) alters the conductance-voltage curve, slows activation and deactivation time courses of BK channels. Its extracellular loop (h beta 4-loop) specifically impedes ChTX to bind BK channel pore. However, the structure of beta 4 subunit's extracellular loop and the molecular mechanism for gating kinetics, toxin sensitivity of BK channels regulated by beta 4 are still unclear. To address them, here, we first identified four disulfide bonds in h beta 4-loop by mass spectroscopy and NMR techniques. Then we determined its three-dimensional solution structure, performed NMR titration and electrophysiological analysis, and found that residue Asn123 of beta 4 subunit regulated the gating and pharmacological characteristics of BK channel. Finally, by constructing structure models of BK alpha/beta 4 and thermodynamic double-mutant cycle analysis, we proposed that BKa subunit might interact with beta 4 subunit through the conserved residue Glu264(BK alpha) coupling with residue Asn123(beta 4).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据