4.7 Article

Biological Insights Into Muscular Strength: Genetic Findings in the UK Biobank

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24735-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health
  2. NCI
  3. NHGRI
  4. NHLBI
  5. NIDA
  6. NIMH
  7. NINDS
  8. National Institutes of Health [1R01HL135313-01, 1R01DK106236-01A1]
  9. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [2013.0126]
  10. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  11. Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research
  12. Emil Aaltonen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed a large genome-wide association study to discover genetic variation associated with muscular strength, and to evaluate shared genetic aetiology with and causal effects of muscular strength on several health indicators. In our discovery analysis of 223,315 individuals, we identified 101 loci associated with grip strength (P <5 x 10(-8)). Of these, 64 were associated (P < 0.01 and consistent direction) also in the replication dataset (N=111,610). eQTL analyses highlighted several genes known to play a role in neuro-developmental disorders or brain function, and the results from meta-analysis showed a significant enrichment of gene expression of brain-related transcripts. Further, we observed inverse genetic correlations of grip strength with cardiometabolic traits, and positive correlation with parents' age of death and education. We also showed that grip strength had shared biological pathways with indicators of frailty, including cognitive performance scores. By use of Mendelian randomization, we provide evidence that higher grip strength is protective of both coronary heart disease (OR= 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79, P < 0.0001) and atrial fibrillation (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90, P = 0.003). In conclusion, our results show shared genetic aetiology between grip strength, and cardiometabolic and cognitive health; and suggest that maintaining muscular strength could prevent future cardiovascular events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据