期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 60-78出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1098214011411574
关键词
realist synthesis; evidence-based policy; complex causality; multivalue qualitative comparative analysis; two-step qualitative comparative analysis; transport policy
In this article, the authors state two arguments: first, that the four categories of context, politics, polity, and policy make an adequate framework for systematic review being both exhaustive and parsimonious; second, that the method of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is an appropriate methodical approach for gaining realistic results that are useful for political practice. Instead of providing unsatisfactory monocausal explanations, the approach identifies different combinations of conditions leading to a given outcome. The authors illustrate their points with a two-step multi-value QCA (mvQCA) of 17 transport policy cases in Switzerland.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据