4.5 Article

Continuous measurements of methane mixing ratios from ice cores

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 999-1013

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-999-2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. FNRS-CFB, Belgium
  2. FWO, Belgium
  3. GSC, Canada
  4. CAS, China
  5. FIST, Denmark
  6. IPEV, France
  7. CNRS/INSU, France
  8. CEA, France
  9. ANR, France
  10. AWI, Germany
  11. RannIs, Iceland
  12. NIPR, Japan
  13. KOPRI, Korea
  14. NWO/ALW, Netherlands
  15. VR, Sweden
  16. SNF, Switzerland
  17. NERC, UK
  18. US NSF, USA
  19. European Union [243908]
  20. French ANR NEEM [ANR-07-VULN-09-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a new, field-deployable technique for continuous, high-resolution measurements of methane mixing ratios from ice cores. The technique is based on a continuous flow analysis system, where ice core samples cut along the long axis of an ice core are melted continuously. The past atmospheric air contained in the ice is separated from the melt water stream via a system for continuous gas extraction. The extracted gas is dehumidified and then analyzed by a Wavelength Scanned-Cavity Ring Down Spectrometer for methane mixing ratios. We assess the performance of the new measurement technique in terms of precision (+/- 0.8 ppbv, 1 sigma), accuracy (+/- 8 ppbv), temporal (ca. 100 s), and spatial resolution (ca. 5 cm). Using a firn air transport model, we compare the resolution of the measurement technique to the resolution of the atmospheric methane signal as preserved in ice cores in Greenland. We conclude that our measurement technique can resolve all climatically relevant variations as preserved in the ice down to an ice depth of at least 1980 m (66 000 yr before present) in the North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling ice core. Furthermore, we describe the modifications, which are necessary to make a commercially available spectrometer suitable for continuous methane mixing ratio measurements from ice cores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据