4.7 Article

Genetic diversity and phylogenetic characteristics of Chinese Tibetan and Yi minority ethnic groups revealed by non-CODIS STR markers

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24291-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0800703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330073, 81571854]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [2012017yjsy187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-CODIS STRs, with high polymorphism and allele frequency difference among ethnically and geographically different populations, play a crucial role in population genetics, molecular anthropology, and human forensics. In this work, 332 unrelated individuals from Sichuan Province (237 Tibetan individuals and 95 Yi individuals) are firstly genotyped with 21 non-CODIS autosomal STRs, and phylogenetic relationships with 26 previously investigated populations (9,444 individuals) are subsequently explored. In the Sichuan Tibetan and Yi, the combined power of discrimination (CPD) values are 0.9999999999999999999 and 0.9999999999999999993, and the combined power of exclusion (CPE) values are 0.999997 and 0.999999, respectively. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), multidimensional scaling plots (MDS) and phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that Sichuan Tibetan has a close genetic relationship with Tibet Tibetan, and Sichuan Yi has a genetic affinity with Yunnan Bai group. Furthermore, significant genetic differences have widely existed between Chinese minorities (most prominently for Tibetan and Kazakh) and Han groups, but no population stratifications rather a homogenous group among Han populations distributed in Northern and Southern China are observed. Aforementioned results suggested that these 21 STRs are highly polymorphic and informative in the Sichuan Tibetan and Yi, which are suitable for population genetics and forensic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据