4.6 Article

MgTiO3:Mn4+ a multi-reading temperature nanoprobe

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 33, 页码 18341-18346

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra02482k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [171022]
  2. [36214NE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MgTiO3 nanoparticles doped with Mn4+, with homogeneous size ranging about 63.1 +/- 9.8 nm, were synthesized by a molten salt assisted sol gel method. These nanoparticles have been investigated as optical thermal sensors. The luminescence of tetravalent manganese ion in octahedral environment within the perovskite host presents drastic variations with temperature. Three different thermometry approaches have been proposed and characterized. Two luminescence intensity ratios are studied. Firstly between the two R-lines of Mn4+ emission at low temperature (-250 degrees C and -90 degrees C) with a maximal sensitivity of 0.9% degrees C-1, but also secondly between E-2 (4)A(2) (R-line) and the T-4(2) (4)A(2) transitions. This allows studying the temperature variation within a larger temperature range (-200 degrees C to 50 degrees C) with a sensitivity between 0.6% degrees C-1 and 1.2% degrees C-1 over this range. The last proposed method is the study of the lifetime variation versus temperature. The effective lifetime value corresponds to a combination of transitions from two excited energy levels of the tetravalent manganese (E-2 and T-4(2)) in thermal equilibrium toward the fundamental (4)A(2) state. Since the more energetic transition (T-4(2) (4)A(2)) is spin-allowed, contrary to the E-2 (4)A(2) one, the lifetime drastically decreases with the increase in temperature leading to an impressive high sensitivity value of 4.1% degrees C-1 at 4 degrees C and an exceptional temperature resolution of 0.025 degrees C. According to their optical features, MgTiO3:Mn4+ nanoparticles are indeed suitable candidates for the luminescence temperature probes at the nanoscale over several temperature ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据