4.6 Article

The shape effect on polymer nanoparticle transport in a blood vessel

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 15, 页码 8089-8100

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00033f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21574105, 51725303]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF IIP-1701136, CBET-1113040, CBET-1067502, DMS-1516236]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01HL131750, EB015105]
  4. Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA) program
  5. Alternatives Research & Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticle therapeutic delivery is influenced by many factors including physical, chemical, and biophysical properties along with local vascular conditions. In recent years, nanoparticles of various shapes have been fabricated and have shown significant impact on transport efficiency. Identification of which nanoparticle shape helps to improve the therapeutic delivery process allows for enhanced therapeutic effects, yet is hard to be quantified in vivo due to the complex nature of the in vivo environment. In this work, we turn to biological models as a guide for informing improved nanoparticle therapeutic delivery, and quantify the contribution of various factors on delivery efficiency. Here we show that with a mimetic blood vessel, improved therapeutic delivery is achieved using long filamentous rod nanoparticles under low pressure conditions. When considering medium pressure conditions, a combination of nanoparticle shapes presents improved therapeutic delivery over the treatment time-course starting with long filamentous rod nanoparticles, followed by short rod nanoparticles. Conditions of high pressure required a combination of short rod nanoparticles, followed by spherical nanoparticles to achieve enhanced therapeutic delivery. Overall, improvement of therapeutic delivery via nanoparticle carriers is likely to require a combination of nanoparticle shapes administered at different times over the treatment time-course, given patient specific conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据