4.6 Article

Oxygen functional groups improve the energy storage performances of graphene electrochemical supercapacitors

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 2858-2865

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra12425b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51501124, 51602212]
  2. Basic Research Project in Shanxi Province [2015021071]
  3. Fund Program for the Scientific Activities of Selected Returned Overseas Professionals in MOHRSS
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201701D221073]
  5. Fund Program for the Scientific Activities of Selected Returned Overseas Professionals in Shanxi Province
  6. Key Laboratory Open Project Fund of Graphene Technologies and Applications of Zhejiang Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene is a promising electrode material for supercapacitors due to its superior physical and chemical properties, but the influence of its oxygen functional groups on capacitive performance still remains somewhat uncertain. In this work, graphene sheets with different oxygen content have been prepared through thermal reduction in argon. Furthermore, oxidation and pore-forming treatment of graphene annealed at 800 degrees C are also performed to explore the important effect of oxygen functional groups. The effects of disorder degree, surface area and oxygen functional groups on the specific capacitance were explored systematically. The content and species of oxygen functional groups are found to be significant factors influencing the electrochemical supercapacitor performance of graphene electrodes. The specific capacitances of graphene annealed at 200, 400 and 800 degrees C are 201, 153 and 34 F g(-1), respectively. However, the specific capacitance of graphene reduced at 800 degrees C can be increased to 137 F g(-1) after nitric acid oxidation treatment, and is only 39 F g(-1) after pore forming on graphene surface, demonstrating that the oxygen functional groups can improve the capacitive performances of graphene electrochemical supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据