4.6 Article

Optimizing the precursor of sulfur source for hydrothermal synthesis of high performance CdS for photocatalytic hydrogen production

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 21, 页码 11489-11497

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00250a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21473066, 51772118, 21607027]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1608085QB37, 1408085QB44]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Educational Committee of Anhui Province [KJ2015A133, KJ2017B007]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing of China [201602003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the CdS photocatalyst has been extensively investigated, a rational hydrothermal synthesis route is still required to prepare highly active CdS for H-2 evolution reaction (HER). To optimize the precursor of the sulfur source, three prevalent organic sulfur sources of thiourea (TA), thioacetamide (TAA) and l-cysteine (l-Cys) were used for hydrothermal synthesis of CdS. Their effects on the crystallographic structure, morphology, optical property, band structure, and photocatalytic HER performance of the products were then investigated systematically. The results indicated that hexagonal branched dendritic structure CdS (S-TA) could be produced in TA solution and showed the highest HER activity due to the branched 1D structure, the smallest interfacial electron transfer resistance and the most negative conduction band bottom (E-cb). Whereas in TAA, spherical CdS (S-TAA) with a mixed phase of hexagonal and cubic was obtained. The mixed phase structure and the more positive E-cb of S-TAA lead to a considerably lower HER activity than that of S-TA. Poorly crystallized hexagonal CdS nanoparticles (S-Cys) were prepared in l-Cys and showed the lowest HER performance as its E-cb is very near to H+ reduction potential. Thus, compared to T-AA and l-Cys, TA is a more suitable sulfur source for hydrothermal preparation of highly active CdS for HER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据