4.7 Article

Oxygen vacancy-assisted recovery process for increasing electron mobility in n-type BaSnO3 epitaxial thin films

期刊

NPG ASIA MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 363-371

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41427-018-0038-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2017R1A2B2007819, 2017M2A2A6A01020116]
  2. Brain Korea 21 PLUS project (Center for Creative Industrial Materials)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B2007819, 2017M2A2A6A01020116] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scattering of charge carriers by line defects, i.e., threading dislocations (TDs), severely limits electron mobility in epitaxial semiconductor films grown on dissimilar substrates. The density of TDs needs to be decreased to further enhance electron mobility in lattice-mismatched epitaxial films and heterostructures for application in high-performance electronic devices. Here, we report a strategy for the post-treatment of epitaxial La-doped BaSnO3 (LBSO) films by delicately controlling the oxygen partial pressure p(O-2), which achieved a significant increase in the room temperature (RT) electron mobility (mu(e)) to mu(e) = 122 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) at a carrier concentration of 1.1 x 10(20) cm(-3). This mobility enhancement is mostly attributed to an oxygen vacancy-assisted recovery process that reduces the density of TDs by accelerating the movement of dislocations in ionic crystals under a p(O-2)-controlled treatment despite an increase in the density of charged point defects. Our finding suggests that accurate control of the interactions between point defects and line defects can reduce dominant carrier scattering by charged dislocations in epitaxial oxide semiconductors that have dissimilar substrates. This method provides alternative approaches to achieving perovskite oxide heterostructures that have high RT mu(e) values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据