4.8 Article

The threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 695-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. CNPq
  5. Humboldt Foundation
  6. Brazilian Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In exchange for political support, the Brazilian government is signalling landholders to increase deforestation, putting the country's contribution to the Paris Agreement at risk(1). The President of Brazil has signed provisionary acts and decrees lowering environmental licensing requirements, suspending the ratification of indigenous lands, reducing the size of protected areas and facilitating land grabbers to obtain the deeds of illegally deforested areas(2). This could undermine the success of Brazil's CO2 emission reductions through control of deforestation in the previous decade. Integrated assessment models are tools to assess progress in fulfilling global efforts to curb climate change(3,4). Using integrated assessment models developed for Brazil, we explore 2 degrees C-compliant CO2 emission scenarios estimating the effort needed in other sectors of the economy to compensate for the weakening of environmental governance, potentially resulting in higher deforestation emissions. We found that the risk of reversals of recent trends in deforestation governance could impose a burden on other sectors that would need to deploy not yet mature technologies to compensate for higher emissions from land-use change. The abandonment of deforestation control policies and the political support for predatory agricultural practices make it impossible to meet targets consistent with Brazil's contribution to a 2 degrees C world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据