4.6 Article

RRPP: An R package for fitting linear models to high-dimensional data using residual randomization

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 1772-1779

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13029

关键词

dissimilarity; generalized least-squares; high-dimensional data; multivariate

类别

资金

  1. Division of Environmental Biology [1556379, 1737895]
  2. NSF DEB Awards [1556379, 1737895]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1737895, 1556379] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Residual randomization in permutation procedures (RRPP) is an appropriate means of generating empirical sampling distributions for ANOVA statistics and linear model coefficients, using ordinary or generalized least-squares estimation. This is an especially useful approach for high-dimensional (multivariate) data. 2. Here, we present an r package that provides a comprehensive suite of tools for applying RRPP to linear models. Important available features include choices for OLS or GLS coefficient estimation, data or dissimilarity matrix analysis capability, choice among types I, II, or III sums of squares and cross-products, various effect size estimation methods, and an ability to perform mixed-model ANOVA. 3. The lm.rrpp function is similar to the lm function in many regards, but provides coefficient and ANOVA statistics estimates over many random permutations. The S3 generic functions commonly used with lm also work with lm.rrpp. Additionally, a pairwise function provides statistical tests for comparisons of least-squares means or slopes, among designated groups. Users have many options for varying random permutations. Compared to similar available packages and functions, RRPP is extremely fast and yields comprehensive results for downstream analyses and graphics, following model fits with lm.rrpp. 4. The RRPP package facilitates analysis of both univariate and multivariate response data, even when the number of variables exceeds the number of observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据