3.8 Article

Clinical safety plan in a university hospital complex. Initial diagnosis: Study of adverse events

期刊

REVISTA DE CALIDAD ASISTENCIAL
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 189-196

出版社

ELSEVIER DOYMA SL
DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2011.10.005

关键词

Patient safety; Adverse events; Hospital care quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To establish the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and incidence of patients with AEs in the University Hospital Complex of Albacete (CHUA); to identify and define the AEs which are linked to health care; to analyse avoidable AE and determine their impact; to plan improvement actions. Method: Design: Retrospective cohort study. Sample: Patients registered from 5 November to 19 November, 2007. Case definition: Any accident or incident reported in the medical record which injured or may have injured the patient. Material: Adverse Events Screening Guide, adapted from the Harvard study. Spanish version of the Modular Review Form (MRF2) for retrospective case record review. Statistical Analysis: Univariate and bivariate analysis and logistic regression model. Results: The incidence of patients with AEs linked to hospital care was 6.8%. The incidence was significantly different depending on: age, presence of intrinsic or extrinsic risk factors (excluding peripheral venous catheter); 8.2% of AE was linked to care; 14.3% to medication; 26.5% to nosocomial infections; 35.7% to technical problems in procedures; 11.2% to diagnosis, and the remaining 4.1% to other types of AEs. In these incidences, 12.2% were considered mild, 78.6% moderate and 8.2% serious. Half (50%) of AEs caused an increase in hospital stay, and in 34.7% cases determined hospitalisation. A total of 63.3% of AEs were considered avoidable. Conclusions: The study of AEs in the CHUA represents an improvement within the hospital quality program. Incidences of patients with AEs and those related to health care fall within the range of those found in the studies where the objective was quality improvement. (C) 2011 SECA. Published by Elsevier Espania, S. L. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据