4.8 Article

Minimax Probability TSK Fuzzy System Classifier: A More Transparent and Highly Interpretable Classification Model

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 813-826

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2328014

关键词

Classification; medical diagnosis; minimax probability decision; Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61170122, 61272210]
  2. Ministry of education program for New Century Excellent Talents [NCET-120882]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51321B]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011003]
  5. Australian Research Council [DP130102691, LP120100566]
  6. Australian Research Council [LP120100566] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When an intelligent model is used for medical diagnosis, it is desirable to have a high level of interpretability and transparent model reliability for users. Compared with most of the existing intelligence models, fuzzy systems have shown a distinctive advantage in their interpretabilities. However, how to determine the model reliability of a fuzzy system trained for a recognition task is still an unsolved problem at present. In this study, a minimax probability Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy system classifier called MP-TSK-FSC is proposed to train a fuzzy system classifier and determine the model reliability simultaneously. For the proposed MP-TSK-FSC, a lower bound of correct classification can be presented to the users to characterize the reliability of the trained fuzzy classifier. Thus, the obtained classifier has the distinctive characteristics of both a high level of interpretability and transparent model reliability inherited from the fuzzy system and minimax probability learning strategy, respectively. Our experiments on synthetic datasets and several real-world datasets for medical diagnosis have confirmed the distinctive characteristics of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据