4.6 Article

MR findings of primary ovarian granulosa cell tumor with focus on the differentiation with other ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0416-x

关键词

Ovarian granulosa cell tumor; Sex-cord tumor; MRI; Diagnostic imaging

资金

  1. Shanghai Natural Science Funding grant [14ZR1404400]
  2. Shanghai emerging advanced technology joint research project [SHDC12014130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian granulosa cell tumors (OGCTs) and compare with othei sex cord-stromal tumors (OSCs) in ovary. Methods: MR findings of 18 patients with surgically confirmed ovarian granulosa cell tumor were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists with consensus reading. All MR examinations were prospectively performed within one month. Clinical and imaging characteristics of OGCTs were evaluated and compared with OSCs (control group). Results: In 18 patients, 20 ovarian granulosa cell tumors were detected on MRI. Sixteen tumors appeared as solid or mostly solid mass (16/20), while 4 tumors as cystic mass. Pathological pelvic fluid was detected in 1 OGCT (1/18) and 11 OSCs (11/34) (p = 0.031).On T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), most of OGCTs displayed hyperintense signal and mixed signal (19/20); on T1 weighted imaging (T1WI), 11 OGCTs (11/20) displayed similar signal as on T2WI imaging The lesion signal between OGCT and OSC differed significantly on both T1WI (p = 0.017) and T2WI (p = 0.002). Tumoral bleeding was detected in 6 OGCTs on MRI. On diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) images, OGCTs mostly appeared as high signal (16/20). Average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value derived from DWI images in the OGCT group (0.84 +/- 0.26x10(-3) mm(2)/s was less than the control group (1.22 +/- 0.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) with statistical difference (p = 0.002). Conclusions: MRI could provide important information in OGCT diagnosis. ADC value might be useful in differentiating OGCT from OSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据