4.6 Article

HE4 level in ascites may assess the ovarian cancer chemotherapeutic effect

期刊

JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0402-3

关键词

Ovarian cancer; Malignant ascites; HE4; CA125; Marker

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372611, 81301750]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars
  3. State Education Ministry (2013) [1792]
  4. Heilongjiang college talent support project [1254HQ005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The clinical treatment of ovarian cancer with ascites is problematic. The main reasons for treatment failure are the susceptibility to intraperitoneal metastasis and chemotherapeutic drug resistance. The purpose and significance of this study is to evaluate which marker might evaluate treatment efficacy and improve the cure rate. Results: This study compared a no chemotherapy group with a chemotherapy group regarding the determination of carbohydrate antigen 125 and human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer ascitic supernatants and cross-analyzed routine serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels. The level of human epididymis protein 4 in the ascites of the chemotherapy group was significantly lower than that of the no chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the expression of ascitic human epididymis protein 4 correlated positively with serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels (p < 0.001). MDR was positive in 13 of the 30 samples (43.33%) in the chemotherapy group with highly expressed CA125. Conclusion: The level of human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer ascites may reflect the therapeutic effect of ovarian cancer patients, and a high level of human epididymis protein 4 might predict chemoresistance and the possibility of ascites formation. The determination of the expression of human epididymis protein 4 alone or combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 levels in both serum and ascites in ovarian cancer patients with ascites may have important significance for guiding and improving the treatment regimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据