4.7 Review

Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme?

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 862-876

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x

关键词

Streptomyces; actinobacteria; symbiosis; antibiotics

资金

  1. Research Councils UK
  2. Royal Society
  3. University of East Anglia
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  5. Natural Environment Research Council
  6. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  7. MRC [G0801721]
  8. Max Planck Society (MPG)
  9. Medical Research Council [G0801721] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J01074X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G0801721] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. NERC [NE/J01074X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptomyces bacteria are ubiquitous in soil, conferring the characteristic earthy smell, and they have an important ecological role in the turnover of organic material. More recently, a new picture has begun to emerge in which streptomycetes are not in all cases simply free-living soil bacteria but have also evolved to live in symbiosis with plants, fungi and animals. Furthermore, much of the chemical diversity of secondary metabolites produced by Streptomyces species has most likely evolved as a direct result of their interactions with other organisms. Here we review what is currently known about the role of streptomycetes as symbionts with fungi, plants and animals. These interactions can be parasitic, as is the case for scab-causing streptomycetes, which infect plants, and the Streptomyces species Streptomyces somaliensis and Streptomyces sudanensis that infect humans. However, in most cases they are beneficial and growth promoting, as is the case with many insects, plants and marine animals that use streptomycete-produced antibiotics to protect themselves against infection. This is an exciting and newly emerging field of research that will become increasingly important as the search for new antibiotics switches to unusual and under-explored environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据