4.3 Article

Costunolide promotes the proliferation of human hair follicle dermal papilla cells and induces hair growth in C57BL/6 mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 414-421

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12674

关键词

BMP/Smad; costunolide; human hair follicle dermal papilla cells; mouse hair growth; Shh/Gli; TGF; WNT/ beta-catenin

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [R0004663]
  2. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Promoting Regional specialized Industry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Costunolide (COS), a naturally occurring sesquiterpene lactone, is known to exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer effects. This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of costunolide on the promotion of hair growth. Methods Real-time cell analyzer (RTCA), measurement of 5 alpha-reductase activity, mRNA expression, and Western blotting were adopted to address whether COS can stimulate the proliferation of human hair follicle dermal papilla cells (hHFDPCs). The effect of COS on in vivo hair growth was examined by reconstitution assay and shaven dorsal skin in C57BL/6 mice. Results Costunolide significantly promoted the proliferation of hHFDPCs, which is comparable to that of tofacitinib. COS also inhibited the 5 alpha-reductase activity in hHFDPCs. While COS increased the level of beta-catenin and Gli1 mRNA and proteins, it suppressed transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 1-induced phosphorylation of Smad-1/5 in hHFDPCs. COS increased the number of cultured hHFDPCs to induce hair follicles from mouse epidermal cells in Spheres formation of reconstitution assay. Topical application of COS on the shaven back of C57BL/6 mice significantly improved the hair growth. Conclusions Our results illustrate that COS promotes hair growth in vitro and in vivo by regulating the amount of growth factors and/or the activity of cellular responses through coordination of the WNT-beta-catenin, hedgehog-Gli, and TGF-beta 1-Smad pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据