4.7 Review

Efficacy of fast track surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 28-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.026

关键词

Fast track surgery; Laparoscopy; Radical resection of gastric cancer; Meta-analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of efficacy and security of fast track surgery (FTS) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Databases and supplemented by other searches to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison of fast track surgery combined with laparoscopy versus laparoscopy separately used in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer before December 2016. After screening for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment, meta-analysis was conducted by the Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: A total of 6 RCTs, involving 464 patients, were included. There were 232 patients in the FTS group and conventional care group separately. Compared with the conventional care group, patients of FTS group had shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD = -1.85, 95% CI: (-2.60, -1.11), P < .00001], earlier first flatus [WMD = -9.33, 95% CI: (-13.74, -4.91), P < .0001], lower level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at postoperative day 4 [WMD = -13.94, 95% CI: (-22.74, -5.15), P = .002], and less hospitalization fees [SMD = -1.12, 95% CI: (-2.07, -0.18), P = .02]. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: Based on current evidence, the FTS protocol is safe and effective in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Due to the limitations of our study, further larger and multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据