4.7 Article

Inhibition of alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase by flavonoid glycosides from Lu'an GuaPian tea: molecular docking and interaction mechanism

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 4173-4183

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8fo00562a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Department of Education [KJ2016A217]
  2. Nutrition and Quality & Safety of Agricultural Products, and Training Object for Key Teacher of Anhui Xinhua University [2018xgg26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green tea may favorably modulate blood glucose homeostasis, and regular consumption of green tea can prevent the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this study, alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase inhibitory effects of the novel acylated flavonol tetraglycoside (camellikaempferoside C, 1) and 14 other flavone and flavone glycosides (FGs) isolated from Lu'an GuaPian (Camellia sinensis L.O. Kuntze) were evaluated. The kaempferol monoglycoside (15) showed inhibitory activity against alpha-glucosidase with IC50 at 40.02 +/- 4.61 mu M, and kaempferol diglycoside (13) showed alpha-amylase inhibition with IC50 at 0.09 +/- 0.02 mu M. Further, inhibitory mechanisms of FGs 15 and 13 were studied by molecular docking analysis and fluorescence spectrometry. Molecular docking suggested that FG 15 interacted with alpha-glucosidase mainly by hydrogen bonding, which was the same interaction force between FG 13 and alpha-amylase. Intrinsic fluorescence of alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase was quenched by 15 and 13, respectively, through a static quenching mechanism. The spontaneous formation of 15-alpha-glucosidase and 13-alpha-amylase complexes was driven by van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding. The present study provides new insight into the potential application of Lu'an GuaPian green tea as a functional food ingredient to regulate postprandial hyperglycemia through inhibition of alpha-glucosidase/alpha-amylase by FGs, particularly the mono(-) and di(-) glycosides of kaempferol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据