4.5 Article

Left ventricular afterload reduction by transcatheter aortic valve implantation in severe aortic stenosis and its prompt effects on comprehensive coronary haemodynamics

期刊

EUROINTERVENTION
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 166-173

出版社

EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00719

关键词

aortic stenosis; fractional flow reserve; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation for research [3200B_163256/1]
  2. Swiss Heart Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims:In this study we aimed to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) afterload reduction in severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) acutely improves coronary haemodynamics. Methods and results: This was a prospective, pathophysiologic study in 40 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. Endpoints were determined invasively immediately before and after TAVI without altering coronary stenotic lesions if present. Myocardial hyperaemia was induced by intravenous adenosine. The primary study endpoints were coronary flow reserve (thermodilution-derived CFR), and fractional flow reserve (FFR). The secondary study endpoint was coronary collateral flow index (CFI) as obtained during a one-minute coronary balloon occlusion. CFR was 1.9 +/- 0.9 before TAVI and 2.0 +/- 1.0 after TAVI (p=0.72). FFR was 0.90 +/- 0.08 before TAVI and 0.93 +/- 0.08 after TAVI (p=0.0021). The TAVI-induced increase in FFR was related to a significant decrease in hyperaemic mean aortic pressure from 71 +/- 16 mmHg before TAVI to 67 +/- 15 mmHg after TAVI (p=0.0099). Hyperaemic CFI increased from 0.127 +/- 0.083 before to 0.146 +/- 0.090 after TAVI (p=0.0508). Conclusions: CFR appears not to be acutely affected by LV afterload reduction among patients with severe AS in response to TAVI. However, it acutely improves FFR; this occurs via lowering of mean aortic pressure. Hyperaemic coronary collateral flow index tends to augment in response to TAVI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据