4.6 Article

Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Decision-Making

期刊

COGNITIVE COMPUTATION
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 769-789

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-018-9569-6

关键词

Dual hesitant fuzzy soft set; Aggregation operator; Multicriteria decision-making; Soft set; Expert system

资金

  1. Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, India under WOS-A scheme [SR/WOS-A/PM-77/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft set theory acts as a fundamental tool for handling the uncertainty in the data by adding a parameterization factor during the process as compared to fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy set theories. Under this environment, dual hesitant fuzzy soft set (DHFSS) is one of the most successful extensions of a fuzzy soft set in which preferences are represented in terms of a set of possible values than a single number. In this paper, some new aggregation operators, namely, dual hesitant fuzzy soft weighted averaging and geometric operators proposed along with their proofs to aggregate the different preferences of the decision-makers. Various desirable properties of its are also investigated in details. Further, these aggregation operators are extended to its generalized operator by incorporating the attitude character of the decision-maker towards the data. In this study, multicriteria decision-making approach is presented based on the proposed operators for solving the decision-making problems. An illustrative example present to demonstrate the approach under DHFSS environment and compared their results with some of the existing approaches results. The proposed measures illustrate with case studies along with the effect of the different parameters on the ordering of the objects which makes the proposed operators more flexible and offers the various choices to the decision-maker for assessing the decisions. From the study, it is concluded that the proposed approach provides a more practical nature to the decision-maker during the aggregation process and hence demonstrate that they place an alternative way for solving the decision-making problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据