4.7 Review

CARs versus BiTEs: A Comparison between T Cell-Redirection Strategies for Cancer Treatment

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 924-934

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0297

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cure Cancer Australia [1100199]
  2. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Foundation
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [1103352, 1132373]
  4. National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) of Australia [IIRS-18-064]
  5. Susan G. Komen [16376637]
  6. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowships
  7. NBCF
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470871, 81671566, 31722019]
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1103352] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The redirection of T cells against tumors holds much promise for the treatment of cancer. Two main approaches for T-cell redirection involve their genetic modification with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), or the use of recombinant proteins designated bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE). These approaches have demonstrated dramatic effects in patients with hematologic cancers, although limited effect against solid cancers. Here, we review and compare the successes and challenges of these two types of immunotherapies, with special focus on their mechanisms, and discuss strategies to improve their efficacy against cancer. Significance : CAR and BiTE cancer therapies have generated much excitement, but although the therapies are potentially competitive, information directly comparing the two is difficult to obtain. Here, we present the fundamentals of each approach and compare the range and level of functions they can elicit from T cells, and their efficacy against cancers. (c) 2018 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据