4.3 Article

Factors associated with type 2 diabetes in patients with vascular dementia: a population-based cross-sectional study

期刊

BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0273-z

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; Comorbidity; Dementia; Socioeconomic status

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [NSC102-2314-B-037-012-MY3]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW103-TD-B-111-05, MOHW104-TDU-B-212-124-003, MOHW105-TDU-B-212-134007]
  3. Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan [SH000183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Incidence of dementia is growing rapidly and affects many people worldwide. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) might link cognitive decline and dementia, but the reasons for this association remain unclear. Our study explored the factors associated with type 2 DM in patients with dementia. Methods: Patients (n = 40,404) with vascular dementia were identified in Taiwan's 1997 to 2008 National Health Insurance Research Database and divided into a DM group and non-DM group. Eleven comorbidities were identified and categorized into four groups: cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, digestive system diseases, renal and metabolic system diseases, and cancer. The associations of these factors with type 2 DM were explored through multivaraible logistic regression. Results: Of the patients with dementia, 22.5% had DM. Associated with a higher likelihood of DM in this population were female sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.52), young age (range of adjusted OR: 0.55-1.13), low income (range of adjusted OR: 1.09-1.18), and renal and metabolic system diseases (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.64-2.98). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that clinicians should encourage patients with dementia to receive regular glucose impairment screening if they are female, have low socioeconomic status, or have renal or metabolic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据