4.8 Review

Beyond Insertion for Na-Ion Batteries: Nanostructured Alloying and Conversion Anode Materials

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201702582

关键词

alloying; anodes; conversion; nanostructure design; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council
  2. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy under the Applied Battery Research for Transportation (ABR) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Helmholtz Association
  4. [DE-EE0006443]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion technology has the potential to become the next generation of low cost and environmentally friendly electrochemical energy storage system for grid-level applications. The low cost and abundant raw materials employed in sodium cells have driven the recent increasing interest in sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), which appear especially appealing, since manufacturers can use the already existing production technology of lithium-ion batteries. However, SIBs are still an early stage technology, which requires several issues affecting cell performance to be addressed. Despite the accelerated development of cathode materials, anode materials still require further investigation and optimization to reach high energy density performance. In the pursuit of high capacity anode materials, several alloying-, conversion-, and combined conversion-alloying-based electrodes have been investigated. This review offers a comprehensive overview on the recent progresses toward the realization of beyond-insertion anode materials. The role of nanostructuration with the associated advantages and disadvantages is presented for each class of compounds, combined with the main strategies adopted to improve the electrochemical behavior. Finally, an overview of the challenges and perspectives associated with the development of the next generation of anode materials is presented with a particular focus on the role of the electrolyte solutions and solid/electrolyte interphase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据