4.8 Review

A Review of Electrocatalytic Reduction of Dinitrogen to Ammonia under Ambient Conditions

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201800369

关键词

electrocatalysis; electrocatalytic reduction of dinitrogen; electrochemical ammonia synthesis; nitrogen reduction reaction; sustainable chemistry

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0202500]
  2. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [21676160, 21706146]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of ammonia (NH3) from molecular dinitrogen (N-2) under mild conditions is one of the most attractive topics in the field of chemistry. Electrochemical reduction of N-2 is promising for achieving clean and sustainable NH3 production with lower energy consumption using renewable energy sources. To date, emerging electrocatalysts for the electrochemical reduction of N-2 to NH3 at room temperature and atmospheric pressure remain largely underexplored. The major challenge is to achieve both high catalytic activity and high selectivity. Here, the recent progress on the electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) at ambient temperature and pressure from both theoretical and experimental aspects is summarized, aiming at extracting instructive perceptions for future NRR research activities. The prevailing theories and mechanisms for NRR as well as computational screening of promising materials are presented. State-of-the-art heterogeneous electrocatalysts as well as rational design of the whole electrochemical systems for NRR are involved. Importantly, promising strategies to enhance the activity, selectivity, efficiency, and stability of electrocatalysts toward NRR are proposed. Moreover, ammonia determination methods are compared and problems relating to possible ammonia contamination of the system are mentioned so as to shed fresh light on possible standard protocols for NRR measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据