4.8 Article

Engineering Crystal Facet of alpha-MnO2 Nanowire for Highly Efficient Catalytic Oxidation of Carcinogenic Airborne Formaldehyde

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 3435-3446

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00456

关键词

crystal facet engineering; alpha-MnO2; formaldehyde; indoor air; density functional theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21677083, 21521064]
  2. Suzhou-Tsinghua innovation guiding program [20165Z0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity of exposed crystal facets directly determines its physicochemical properties. Thus, acquiring a high percentage of reactive facets by crystal facet engineering is highly desirable for improving the catalytic reactivity. Herein, single-crystalline alpha-MnO2 nanowires with major exposed high-index {310} facets were synthesized via a facile hydrothermal route with the assistance of a capping agent of oxalate ions. Comparing with two other low-index facets ({100} and {110}), the resulting alpha-MnO2 nanowires with exposed {310} facets exhibited much better activity and stability for carcinogenic formaldehyde (HCHO) oxidation, making 100% of 100 ppm of HCHO mineralize into CO2 at 60 degrees C, even better than some Ag supported catalysts. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to investigate the difference in the catalytic activity of alpha-MnO2 with exposed {100}, {110}, and {310} facets. The experimental characterization and theoretical calculations all confirm that the {310} facets with high surface energy can not only facilitate adsorption/activation of O-2 and H2O but also be beneficial to the generation of oxygen vacancies, which result in significantly enhanced activity for HCHO oxidation. This is a valuable report on engineering surface facets in the preparation of alpha-MnO2 as highly efficient oxidation catalysts. This study deepens the understanding of facet dependent activity of alpha-MnO2 and points out a strategy to improve their catalytic activity by crystal facet engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据