4.8 Article

Enzyme-Assisted Microbial Electrosynthesis of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) via CO2 Bioreduction by Engineered Ralstonia eutropha

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 4429-4437

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00226

关键词

microbial electrosynthesis; Ralstonia eutropha; formate dehydrogenase; Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21376174, 21621004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB745100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is a promising technology to reduce carbon dioxide using inward electron transfer mechanisms to synthesize value-added chemicals with microorganisms as electrocatalysts and electrons from cathodes as reducing equivalents. To enhance CO2 assimilation in Ralstonia eutropha, a formate dehydrogenase (FDH) assisted MES system was constructed, in which FDH catalyzed the reduction of CO2 to formate in the cathodic chamber. Formate served as the electron carrier to transfer electrons derived from cathodes into R eutropha. To enable efficient formation of formate from CO2, neutral red (NR) was used to facilitate the extracellular regeneration of NADH, the cofactor of FDH. Meanwhile, NR also played an essential role as electron shuttle to directly deliver electrons from cathodes into R. eutropha to increase the level of intracellular reducing equivalents, thus facilitating the efficiency of MES. On the other hand, the Calvin Benson Bassham (CBB) cycle was further engineered by the heterologous expression of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) in R eutropha, which strengthened the CBB pathway for CO, fixation. Upon application of the cathode potential at -0.6 V (vs Ag/AgCI) in the MES system with the genetically engineered R. eutropha, 485 +/- 13 mg/L poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) was obtained, which was similar to 3 times that synthesized by the control (165 +/- 8 mg/L), i.e., the wild-type R. eutropha in the absence of FDH and NR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据