4.8 Article

Identifying Size Effects of Pt as Single Atoms and Nanoparticles Supported on FeOx for the Water-Gas Shift Reaction

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 859-868

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02751

关键词

water-gas shift; size effect; Pt; single atoms; nanoparticles; mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21203181, 21576251, 21573232, 21676269]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2017223]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17020100]
  4. National Key projects for Fundamental Research and Development of China [2016YFA0202801]
  5. National Science Foundation [CHE-1465057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of size effects at an atomic level is essential for designing high-performance metal-based catalysts. Here, the performance of a series of FeOx-supported Pt catalysts with Pt as nanoparticles (Pt-NP) or single atoms (Pt-SAC) are compared for the low-temperature water-gas shift (WGS) reaction. A variety of characterization methods such as adsorption microcalorimetry, H-2-TPR, in situ DRIFTS, and transient analysis of product tests were used to demonstrate that Pt nanoparticles exhibit much higher adsorption strength of CO; the adsorbed CO reacts with the OH groups, which are generated from activated subsequently decompose to produce CO2 and H-2 simultaneously. On the other hand, Pt single atoms promote the formation of oxygen vacancies on FeOx which dissociate H2O to H-2 and adsorbed O that then combines with the weakly adsorbed CO on these Pt sites to produce CO2. The activation energy for the WGS reaction decreases with the downsizing of Pt species, and Pt-SAC possesses the lowest value of 33 kJ/mol. As a result, Pt-SAC exhibits 1 order of magnitude higher specific activity in comparison to Pt -NP. With a loading of only 0.05 wt % the Pt-SAC can achieve similar to 65% CO conversion at 300 degrees C, representing one of the most active catalysts reported so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据